A major marketing cost for Internet and IT companies is the costs of construction 
                            of their web site. Export Incentives has successfully lodged and received 
                            EMDG rebates for web site construction costs, provided it can be established 
                            that the web site is a marketing tool. If the web site is used to both market 
                            and deliver product, apportionment would need to take place between the two 
                            activities, with only the marketing aspect of the web site being eligible 
                            for the rebate. As the web site would be available internationally, then apportionment 
                            would need to take place between local Australasian use and international 
                            use. It is only international use that is eligible. Austrade will look at 
                            independent objective factors, such as the recorded hit rate to create an 
                            analysis of eligibility, as well as the subjective reason for construction 
                            of the web site and the markets at which it is aimed.
                          Many Internet and IT companies are setting up overseas representative offices 
                            and these fully qualify to the extent that these offices are involved in export 
                            sales. Unlike costs incurred in Australia, all overseas representative office 
                            costs fully qualify including salaries, rent and general office costs. There 
                            would need to be apportionment between those costs related to sales and any 
                            costs related to administration of sales (non-eligible). In addition, consideration 
                            needs to be given to the legal structure of the international office. If as 
                            is usual, it is a separately incorporated company, then there needs to be 
                            a legal relationship between the Australian company and the foreign subsidiary 
                            to evidence the foreign subsidiary's role in the selling of the Australian 
                            company's intellectual property and services.
                          Where the sale of intellectual property is through physical CD's, then these 
                            CD's in general terms must be produced in Australia to qualify. If (as is 
                            common) the sale is through the licence of intellectual property, then provided 
                            the intellectual property results from research or other work undertaken in 
                            Australia, if the product is ultimately delivered on a CD Rom, it is 
                            not critical to success of a claim whether the CD Rom is produced in 
                            Australia. This is a similar analogy to the music industry where a record 
                            company will licence the rights to a record master to a foreign company, who 
                            would press the CD's offshore. The export grant is then based on the licensing 
                            income obtained from the sale of the intellectual property, rather then from 
                            the sale of the non eligible good.